Debate shows jurists with different views on impartiality of judiciary
Ljubljana, 29 November - A debate hosted by the Slovenian Bar Association has shown that jurists have diverging views on independence and impartiality of judges. While Supreme Court judge Jan Zobec said that the judiciary had failed in high-profile cases, attorney Emil Zakonjšek warned against judging the work of the entire judiciary based on a few cases.
The rest of this news item is available to subscribers.
The news item consists of 1.655 characters (without spaces) or 308 words words.
Buy the news item. Price: 2 tokens; on account: 0 tokens.